A comparison model, prepared so that the two workshop proposals can be examined against an alternative structure — not so that it can be adopted unchanged.
Illustrative Alternative Framework
Not an official or mandatory allocation standard. It is neither a scientific formula nor a government requirement. It is a discussion instrument with a different set of priorities, offered for comparison.
The final allocation has to rest on actual cost, conservation need, agreements, financial capacity and a village decision — not on this page.
Alternative framework — allocation#
Illustrative Alternative Framework — not an official or mandatory allocation standard.
What each share is meant to cover#
| Category | Share | Use |
|---|---|---|
| Operasional & SDM | 30% | Honor pengelola; Administrasi; Kebersihan; Keamanan; Koordinasi pelayanan; Operasional rutin |
| Konservasi Lingkungan | 25% | Rehabilitasi mangrove; Pemeliharaan kawasan; Monitoring ekosistem; Pengelolaan sampah; Edukasi konservasi |
| Pemberdayaan Masyarakat | 15% | Pelatihan pemandu; Penguatan UMKM; Produk lokal; Pelatihan hospitality; Dukungan kelompok masyarakat |
| Pemeliharaan Sarana & Prasarana | 10% | Jalur wisata; Jembatan; Toilet; Papan informasi; Perlengkapan keselamatan |
| Pengembangan Produk & Promosi | 10% | Paket wisata; Digital marketing; Website; Kerja sama operator; Inovasi pengalaman wisata |
| Kontribusi Kelembagaan | 5% | Hanya dengan dasar perjanjian atau kewenangan yang sah; Tidak dianggap pungutan otomatis |
| Dana Cadangan & Risiko | 5% | Kebutuhan darurat; Kerusakan fasilitas; Keselamatan pengunjung; Gangguan operasional; Likuiditas |
Where this framework does not apply#
| Condition | Why the framework should not simply be adopted |
|---|---|
| No cost data yet | The 30% operational share cannot be validated without real operating records |
| Conservation carried by another budget | A 25% conservation line would double-fund something already paid for |
| No identified institutional recipient | The 5% institutional contribution has no legitimate recipient until the institutional form is settled |
| Very small turnover | Seven lines on a small surplus produces administration without control; fewer lines with clear records may serve better |
The framework is a comparison, not an instruction. Each condition above is a reason to adapt, not to copy.
Supporting documents & downloads
One page can carry several PDF attachments. Until the documentation team uploads them, this section says so instead of offering an empty download.
Supporting documents will be available after publication.
Sources & references
Illustrative comparison framework prepared by the documentation team for discussion. Not adopted, not mandatory.
Editorial status: Proposed framework.
Related content
Financial Governance Overview
How income is generated, recorded, allocated and reported in the two mangrove destinations
The entry point to the financial module: the policy logic, the two workshop proposals, the comparison framework and the route to a decided policy.
ReadFinancial Policy Mind Map
Purpose, income, management, allocation, authority and principle in one framework
The conceptual framework behind the budget policy, with the six aspects that any village decision has to answer.
ReadSugian Financial Policy — Workshop Aspirations & Policy Assessment
Ekowisata Mangrove Sugian · 40 / 30 / 15 / 15 as recorded in the workshop group work
Original workshop proposal: 40% management, 30% conservation & operations, 15% partners, 15% PADes — not approved, with a policy assessment of each line.
Read