This page records what the Sugian group proposed in the workshop, and then examines each line against what it would take to make it work.
Original Workshop Proposal — Not Approved
The 40 / 30 / 15 / 15 split is exactly what the group recorded. It is not a village policy, and publishing it here does not make it one. The assessment below is a recommendation, not a decision.
From aspiration to policy#
A proposal becomes a policy through the four steps on the decision register: financial feasibility, institutional and legal review, community deliberation and a documented decision. None of those steps has been completed for Sugian.
Proposed allocation#
Honor pengurus berdasarkan SK; insentif staf.
Kebutuhan konservasi dan kebutuhan operasional sesuai rincian yang akan disepakati.
Pemodal, koperasi desa, BUMDes, mitra perorangan sesuai perjanjian.
Pola dan alur distribusi masih memerlukan pembahasan.
Total: 100% — a proposal for community discussion, not an adopted policy.
Revenue sources#
| Source | Classification | Note |
|---|---|---|
| Tiket wisata | Pendapatan wisata | Entrance fee to the mangrove ecotourism area. |
| Paket ekowisata | Pendapatan wisata | Combined visit packages. |
| Wahana atau fasilitas wisata | Pendapatan fasilitas | Tour rides and facilities offered at the destination. |
| Makanan dan minuman | Pendapatan usaha | Food and drink sold at or near the destination. |
| Kerja sama UMKM | Kemitraan | Cooperation with small businesses — only the organisation's share is its revenue. |
| Penyewaan peralatan | Pendapatan fasilitas | Rental of visitor equipment. |
| Penyertaan modal desa | Pembiayaan potensial (bukan pendapatan usaha) | Village capital contribution — a funding source, not trading revenue. |
| Hibah dan dukungan lembaga | Pembiayaan potensial (hibah terikat) | Grants and institutional support — restricted unless stated otherwise. |
A funding source is not automatically revenue: capital, grants and loans are classified before anything is distributed.
Policy assessment#
| Aspiration | Benefit | Risk | Requirement | Recommendation | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pengelola 40% | Covers the management body's honourarium and staff incentive, and gives the organisation a predictable basis to operate. | Must separate routine honourarium, performance-based incentive and the direct cost of delivering the service. Otherwise the 40% is spent twice: once as pay, once as operational cost. | Split the 40% into three sub-lines with their own record; state the SK basis for the honourarium. | Proposed | Proposed |
| Konservasi & operasional 30% | One line funds both the ecosystem work and the daily operation of the destination. | A single combined line lets operational spending absorb the conservation budget, and then nobody can show what was spent on the mangrove. | Split into two sub-budgets with separate records; report the conservation spend separately each month. | Proposed | Proposed |
| Mitra 15% | Recognises the capital, cooperative, BUMDes and individual partners who support the destination. | Cannot be distributed while no partner is identified, no contribution is documented and no agreement exists. Paying it anyway is a leak with a label on it. | Pay only against an identified partner, a documented contribution and a signed agreement; otherwise hold the share and record it as undistributed. | Pending verification | Proposed |
| PADes 15% | Contribution to the village, aligning the destination with village finance. | Needs a legal basis, an identified receiving party, a payment procedure and a village recording mechanism. Without them it is a transfer with no accountability. | Confirm the institutional form and the village regulation basis before any payment; separate the PADes contribution from social spending. | Requires institutional & legal verification | Proposed |
Assessment by the documentation team — a recommendation, not an adopted decision.
Revenue sources recorded for Sugian#
-
01
Ticket#
Entrance to the mangrove ecotourism area.
-
02
Wahana wisata#
Tour rides at the destination.
-
03
Ecotourism packages#
Combined visit packages.
-
04
Food and beverage#
Sold at or near the destination.
-
05
UMKM cooperation#
Small business partners selling to visitors.
-
06
Equipment rental#
Rental of visitor equipment.
-
07
Institutional support#
Proposed village financing and support from partner institutions.
As documented in the workshop group work.
Workshop allocation — Sugian#
Original Workshop Proposal recorded on 18 October 2026. Not approved.
A. Sumber pendapatan dan pembiayaan#
| Sumber | Klasifikasi | Keterangan |
|---|---|---|
| Tiket wisata | Pendapatan wisata | Entrance fee to the mangrove ecotourism area. |
| Paket ekowisata | Pendapatan wisata | Combined visit packages. |
| Wahana atau fasilitas wisata | Pendapatan fasilitas | Tour rides and facilities offered at the destination. |
| Makanan dan minuman | Pendapatan usaha | Food and drink sold at or near the destination. |
| Kerja sama UMKM | Kemitraan | Cooperation with small businesses — only the organisation's share is its revenue. |
| Penyewaan peralatan | Pendapatan fasilitas | Rental of visitor equipment. |
| Penyertaan modal desa | Pembiayaan potensial (bukan pendapatan usaha) | Village capital contribution — a funding source, not trading revenue. |
| Hibah dan dukungan lembaga | Pembiayaan potensial (hibah terikat) | Grants and institutional support — restricted unless stated otherwise. |
Only the organisation's share of UMKM sales is its revenue — not the whole turnover of the stall.
C. Policy assessment matrix#
| Aspiration | Benefit | Risk | Requirement | Recommendation | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pengelola 40% | Covers the management body's honourarium and staff incentive, and gives the organisation a predictable basis to operate. | Must separate routine honourarium, performance-based incentive and the direct cost of delivering the service. Otherwise the 40% is spent twice: once as pay, once as operational cost. | Split the 40% into three sub-lines with their own record; state the SK basis for the honourarium. | Proposed | |
| Konservasi & operasional 30% | One line funds both the ecosystem work and the daily operation of the destination. | A single combined line lets operational spending absorb the conservation budget, and then nobody can show what was spent on the mangrove. | Split into two sub-budgets with separate records; report the conservation spend separately each month. | Proposed | |
| Mitra 15% | Recognises the capital, cooperative, BUMDes and individual partners who support the destination. | Cannot be distributed while no partner is identified, no contribution is documented and no agreement exists. Paying it anyway is a leak with a label on it. | Pay only against an identified partner, a documented contribution and a signed agreement; otherwise hold the share and record it as undistributed. | Pending verification | |
| PADes 15% | Contribution to the village, aligning the destination with village finance. | Needs a legal basis, an identified receiving party, a payment procedure and a village recording mechanism. Without them it is a transfer with no accountability. | Confirm the institutional form and the village regulation basis before any payment; separate the PADes contribution from social spending. | Requires institutional & legal verification |
Assessment by the documentation team. Each row is a recommendation, not an adopted decision.
Usulan sewa lapak UMKM
Rp 50.000 per bulan — recorded in the workshop as a preliminary proposal. Status: Preliminary Proposal. It has not been agreed with the stall operators and does not yet appear in any budget.
Supporting documents & downloads
One page can carry several PDF attachments. Until the documentation team uploads them, this section says so instead of offering an empty download.
Supporting documents will be available after publication.
Sources & references
Workshop discussion, Lokakarya SOP Ekowisata, 16–18 Oktober 2026 (group work, Sugian and Seruni Mumbul).
Editorial status: Workshop discussion.
Related content
Financial Governance Overview
How income is generated, recorded, allocated and reported in the two mangrove destinations
The entry point to the financial module: the policy logic, the two workshop proposals, the comparison framework and the route to a decided policy.
ReadFinancial Policy Mind Map
Purpose, income, management, allocation, authority and principle in one framework
The conceptual framework behind the budget policy, with the six aspects that any village decision has to answer.
ReadSeruni Mumbul Financial Policy — Workshop Aspirations & Policy Assessment
Ekowisata Mangrove Denda Seruni · 40 / 20 / 20 / 20 as recorded in the workshop group work
Original workshop proposal: 40% management, 20% operations, 20% maintenance, 20% PADes — not approved, with a policy assessment of each line.
Read