This page records what the Seruni Mumbul group proposed in the workshop, and then examines each line — including the line that is missing.
Original Workshop Proposal — Not Approved
The 40 / 20 / 20 / 20 split is exactly what the group recorded. It is not a village policy. The assessment below is a recommendation, not a decision.
The conservation question#
The formula has no explicit conservation line. That does not mean conservation is not done — it means the funding source for it has not yet been defined, and ecosystem monitoring has no budget of its own. This is recorded as Requires clarification, not as an omission to be glossed over.
Proposed allocation#
Pengurus yang tercantum dalam SK sebagai anggota.
Bensin, makan dan minum, kebersihan, ATK dan tiket.
Perawatan jembatan, penambahan fasilitas, pengembangan fasilitas.
Usulan dana sosial, insentif RT, bantuan kematian.
Total: 100% — a proposal for community discussion, not an adopted policy.
Revenue sources#
| Source | Classification | Note |
|---|---|---|
| Tiket | Pendapatan wisata | Entrance to the Denda Seruni mangrove area. |
| Kano | Pendapatan wisata | Canoe trips on the mangrove waterway. |
| Penyewaan perlengkapan camping | Pendapatan fasilitas | Camping equipment rental. |
| Penyewaan tenda | Pendapatan fasilitas | Tent rental. |
| Lapak usaha | Pendapatan usaha | Community business stalls. |
| Sewa lapak | Pendapatan usaha | Stall rental charge. |
| Parkir | Pendapatan fasilitas | Vehicle parking charge. |
A funding source is not automatically revenue: capital, grants and loans are classified before anything is distributed.
Policy assessment#
| Aspiration | Benefit | Risk | Requirement | Recommendation | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pengelola 40% | Funds the management body listed in the SK. | One flat percentage does not distinguish a coordinator from a gate officer, so it invites an argument each time it is paid. | Set the honourarium by role, workload and an organisational agreement, then check that the total fits inside the 40%. | Proposed | Proposed |
| Operasional 20% | Covers fuel, food, cleaning, stationery and tickets — the real cost of opening each day. | Whether 20% is enough can only be answered by actual cost data, which does not exist yet. | Test the 20% against three months of actual operating records before adopting the formula. | Pending verification | Proposed |
| Perawatan 20% | Covers the boardwalk, facility additions and facility development. | Routine maintenance, repair and investment are different things with different lifespans; mixing them hides deferred repair. | Split into routine maintenance, repair and development; keep a maintenance reserve. | Proposed | Proposed |
| PADes 20% | Proposed village contribution, described in the workshop as social fund, RT incentive and bereavement support. | A village contribution and a village social-spending decision are two different things. Village spending must follow the applicable budgeting procedure, not the destination's preference. | Separate the transfer to the village from the social programme; confirm the village regulation basis and the recording mechanism. | Requires institutional & legal verification | Proposed |
| Konservasi | Not an explicit line in the formula. | The absence of a conservation line does not mean conservation is not done — it means the funding source for it is not yet defined, and monitoring has no budget of its own. | Clarify which line funds conservation (operational, maintenance or a new line) and how ecosystem monitoring is paid for. | Requires clarification | Proposed |
Assessment by the documentation team — a recommendation, not an adopted decision.
Revenue sources recorded for Seruni Mumbul#
-
01
Ticket#
Entrance to the Denda Seruni mangrove area.
-
02
Canoe#
Canoe trips on the mangrove waterway.
-
03
Camping#
Camping activity at the destination.
-
04
Tent and equipment rental#
Rental of tents and camping equipment.
-
05
Business stalls#
Visitor stalls run by the community.
-
06
Stall rent#
Rental charge for stall space.
-
07
Parking#
Vehicle parking charge.
As documented in the workshop group work. No percentage formula was agreed.
Workshop allocation — Seruni Mumbul#
Original Workshop Proposal recorded on 18 October 2026. Not approved.
A. Sumber pendapatan#
| Sumber | Klasifikasi | Keterangan |
|---|---|---|
| Tiket | Pendapatan wisata | Entrance to the Denda Seruni mangrove area. |
| Kano | Pendapatan wisata | Canoe trips on the mangrove waterway. |
| Penyewaan perlengkapan camping | Pendapatan fasilitas | Camping equipment rental. |
| Penyewaan tenda | Pendapatan fasilitas | Tent rental. |
| Lapak usaha | Pendapatan usaha | Community business stalls. |
| Sewa lapak | Pendapatan usaha | Stall rental charge. |
| Parkir | Pendapatan fasilitas | Vehicle parking charge. |
C. Policy assessment matrix#
| Aspiration | Benefit | Risk | Requirement | Recommendation | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pengelola 40% | Funds the management body listed in the SK. | One flat percentage does not distinguish a coordinator from a gate officer, so it invites an argument each time it is paid. | Set the honourarium by role, workload and an organisational agreement, then check that the total fits inside the 40%. | Proposed | |
| Operasional 20% | Covers fuel, food, cleaning, stationery and tickets — the real cost of opening each day. | Whether 20% is enough can only be answered by actual cost data, which does not exist yet. | Test the 20% against three months of actual operating records before adopting the formula. | Pending verification | |
| Perawatan 20% | Covers the boardwalk, facility additions and facility development. | Routine maintenance, repair and investment are different things with different lifespans; mixing them hides deferred repair. | Split into routine maintenance, repair and development; keep a maintenance reserve. | Proposed | |
| PADes 20% | Proposed village contribution, described in the workshop as social fund, RT incentive and bereavement support. | A village contribution and a village social-spending decision are two different things. Village spending must follow the applicable budgeting procedure, not the destination's preference. | Separate the transfer to the village from the social programme; confirm the village regulation basis and the recording mechanism. | Requires institutional & legal verification | |
| Konservasi | Not an explicit line in the formula. | The absence of a conservation line does not mean conservation is not done — it means the funding source for it is not yet defined, and monitoring has no budget of its own. | Clarify which line funds conservation (operational, maintenance or a new line) and how ecosystem monitoring is paid for. | Requires clarification |
Assessment by the documentation team. Each row is a recommendation, not an adopted decision.
PADes 20% — Requires Institutional & Legal Verification
The workshop described this share as a social fund, RT incentive and bereavement support. A village contribution and a village social-spending decision are different mechanisms, and village spending must follow the village budgeting procedure. No payment may be made on the strength of this proposal alone.
Supporting documents & downloads
One page can carry several PDF attachments. Until the documentation team uploads them, this section says so instead of offering an empty download.
Supporting documents will be available after publication.
Sources & references
Workshop discussion, Lokakarya SOP Ekowisata, 16–18 Oktober 2026 (group work, Sugian and Seruni Mumbul).
Editorial status: Workshop discussion.
Related content
Financial Governance Overview
How income is generated, recorded, allocated and reported in the two mangrove destinations
The entry point to the financial module: the policy logic, the two workshop proposals, the comparison framework and the route to a decided policy.
ReadFinancial Policy Mind Map
Purpose, income, management, allocation, authority and principle in one framework
The conceptual framework behind the budget policy, with the six aspects that any village decision has to answer.
ReadSugian Financial Policy — Workshop Aspirations & Policy Assessment
Ekowisata Mangrove Sugian · 40 / 30 / 15 / 15 as recorded in the workshop group work
Original workshop proposal: 40% management, 30% conservation & operations, 15% partners, 15% PADes — not approved, with a policy assessment of each line.
Read