The workshop proposed a village share in both destinations — 15% in Sugian and 20% in Seruni Mumbul. Neither figure is an obligation, and neither creates recognised village revenue on its own.
Requires Institutional & Legal Verification
A village contribution becomes Pendapatan Asli Desa only through the mechanism that applies to the village: an institutional form, an organisational SK, a relationship to BUMDes, an asset and ownership arrangement, a cooperation basis, and a village budgeting procedure. None of that has been established for either destination.
Six distinct things#
| Term | What it is | What it is not |
|---|---|---|
| Pendapatan usaha pengelola | Trading income of the management organisation | Not village revenue |
| Biaya jasa | What it costs to deliver the service, paid to guide or boat | Not an allocation |
| Bagi hasil mitra | A partner share under a valid agreement | Not automatic for every partner |
| Kontribusi kepada desa | A transfer proposed by the destination to the village | Not yet recognised village revenue |
| Pendapatan Asli Desa (PADes) | Village revenue recognised through the village mechanism | Not created by a workshop percentage |
| Belanja dan program sosial desa | Village spending decided through village budgeting | Not the same as the PADes contribution |
A destination cannot decide village spending, and a village percentage cannot create village revenue by itself.
Proposed village shares vs status#
| Destination | Proposed share | Stated use in the workshop | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sugian | 15% | Pola dan alur distribusi belum dibahas | Requires institutional & legal verification |
| Seruni Mumbul | 20% | Usulan dana sosial, insentif RT, bantuan kematian | Requires institutional & legal verification |
Both are workshop proposals. Neither is an obligation, a levy or a recognised village entitlement.
Verification required before any payment to the village#
Institutional form#
- What legal form the management body actually has
Organisational SK#
- The decree that names the office holders
BUMDes relationship#
- Whether and how the destination sits inside or beside BUMDes
Asset ownership#
- Who owns the boardwalk, jetty, boats and the land they sit on
Cooperation basis#
- The agreement that governs the relationship
Village regulation#
- The rule that authorises receipt of the contribution
Receipt mechanism#
- How the village records and receipts the incoming money
Budgeting procedure#
- How the village decides the use of the funds
Separation of social spending#
- How a social programme is decided separately from the transfer
Reporting back#
- How the village reports the use of the contribution to the community
Ten items. Until they are answered, a village share is a proposal with a number, not a payment.
Data not yet available
No village income, PADes figure, village regulation number or institutional decision is published here, because none exists in documentary form for this programme. The register above shows exactly what is missing.
Supporting documents & downloads
One page can carry several PDF attachments. Until the documentation team uploads them, this section says so instead of offering an empty download.
Supporting documents will be available after publication.
Sources & references
Workshop discussion, Lokakarya SOP Ekowisata, 16–18 Oktober 2026 (group work, Sugian and Seruni Mumbul).
Editorial status: Proposed framework.
Related content
Financial Governance Overview
How income is generated, recorded, allocated and reported in the two mangrove destinations
The entry point to the financial module: the policy logic, the two workshop proposals, the comparison framework and the route to a decided policy.
ReadFinancial Policy Mind Map
Purpose, income, management, allocation, authority and principle in one framework
The conceptual framework behind the budget policy, with the six aspects that any village decision has to answer.
ReadSugian Financial Policy — Workshop Aspirations & Policy Assessment
Ekowisata Mangrove Sugian · 40 / 30 / 15 / 15 as recorded in the workshop group work
Original workshop proposal: 40% management, 30% conservation & operations, 15% partners, 15% PADes — not approved, with a policy assessment of each line.
Read